Australia, a Tapestry of Cultures

In spite of the above, it could be affirmed that the Australian problem is found only in the illegal entry ways. Through collaboration with the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR), the country accepts an average of 12,000 refugees for resettlement in Australia, and between 2015 and 2016 it has increased its figure to 25,750 refugees .

Be that as it may, Australia is not only exposed to international scrutiny in relation to its migratory and asylum policies: its economy, labor market, pensions and even health and education, which are nourished by the presence of international students from developing countries, they would suffer a severe blow from which History has proven that it would be difficult to recover without recourse to the promotion of immigration.Contact Australian Skilled Immigration Consultant

The governments that succeed him will maintain those minimums and, in some cases, will continue to expand them . In 1973, Australia acceded to the Protocol to the Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, which extends the protection of that Convention to an international scope without any temporary restriction - the 1951 Convention only included under the concept of refugees those affected by the Convention. events "in Europe" after January 1951-.

Indeed, some qualification standards were maintained and, in many cases, Australian migration officers themselves went to refugee camps in countries such as Thailand or Indonesia to select them based on their training or knowledge of English. Despite this, the presence of refugees from South America, the Middle East and Asia increased remarkably, and the term boat people was even coined to refer to them by arriving on the island in boats.

Neither with you nor without you: a historical dilemma for the Australia of the present

Since the 1990s, the Australian immigration policy has been split between two competing ideas about the country's thin line of stability. Taking the simplification to the extreme, it could be said that the debate is served between lower quotas and greater homogeneity of society or higher quotas and multiculturalism.

Example of the first case is the one known as One Australia Policy . This is promoted for the first time in 1996 under the liberal government of John Howard and its motto was "One nation, one future". Its purpose was to reduce multiculturalism within Australia by reverting to race as a determining factor, which caused a significant decrease in the number of Asian immigrants. These policies generated rejection within the Liberal Party, but it is also speculated that they were the origin of the ultraconservative and nationalist party One Nation by Pauline Hanson, who defined multiculturalism as " a threat to the foundations of Australian culture, identity and values. "

At present, defenders and detractors face each other at all levels of society. Concerns about security have meant that not only look from the most nationalist sectors to Asian immigration, but have also extended to include religious factors, such as professing Islam, with one in two Australians in favor of banning the entrance of Muslims in the country.

However, recent international challenges and the increase in arrivals of immigrants and asylum seekers in Australia have tipped the balance towards more restrictive policies, without distinction as to which political party is in the Government. Thus, the Australian law requires the arrest of all those who enter without a visa in their territory until it is granted or they are expelled - there is no time limit. Not only the conditions and overpopulation of these centers, internationally denounced for violating human rights , pose a problem, since, being legally of arrests, they pose a penalty to the asylum seeker, which is prohibited in international law.
For Futher Information : Apply online BusinessVisa AustraliaWebsite